🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made persona of the president. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from disorder. While the character's name Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this same narrative instead of debunking it. An adaptation based on a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody ever begged him to take the job. The presidency was effectively a selection process with many contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• The shortlist included various figures, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier interpretation led local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with his surfaced on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's omission of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. His influence is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.